Kentucky HB 457 - $2.6 Billion in Additional Healthcare Costs for Kentucky Employers and Patients - Bim Group

Kentucky HB 457 – $2.6 Billion in Additional Healthcare Costs for Kentucky Employers and Patients

Kentucky House Bill 457 applies to both fully-insured and self-funded ERISA/non-ERISA plans and places several new, costly mandates on employers that will restrict their ability to design and offer affordable prescription drugs benefits for their employees. These new mandates include provisions to restrict the use of preferred pharmacy networks (including mail-order options), management of specialty drugs, establishing reimbursement minimums, requiring PBMs to become a fiduciary, and prohibiting white bagging policies.

Employers are already having difficulty finding and attracting workers as they recover from the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Now is not the time to raise their healthcare costs restricting their ability to offer affordable, high-quality health benefits to employees and their families.

This proposed legislation will cost the state almost $3 billion in increased prescription drug costs over the next 10 years when looking at only a few key areas.

The core mission of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) is to reduce prescription drug costs for health plan sponsors so that consumers have affordable access to needed prescription drugs. PBMs offer a variety of services to their health-plan-sponsor clients and patients that improve prescription adherence, reduce medication errors, and manage drug costs. Health insurance costs are already a big challenge for employers of every size in Kentucky. If HB 457 becomes law, it will take away the ability of employers to utilize important strategies and flexibilities in managing their drug benefits.

Health insurance is an essential part of how we recruit and retain employees in the Commonwealth, and we believe that further restricting the tools available to keep out-of-pocket costs and premiums affordable is the wrong direction for Kentucky. Health mandates placed on employee benefits restrict insurers and employer’s ability to control costs – making the crisis in the workforce even worse.

For employers interested in taking action in opposing HB 457, the most effective thing you can do is reach out to your state legislator or members of House leadership and urge them to oppose HB457. Here are two ways in which you can do this:

  1. Call the legislative message hotline and ask your representative to oppose HB457, 1-800-372-7181.
  2. Use this drafted letter to send or email.

Recent Insights

November 5, 2026
News

DOL Clarifies MHPAEA Enforcement Priorities

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has provided employers and group health plans with a clearer picture of how it intends to enforce the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA). The DOL issued Field Assistance Bulletin 2026-03, outlining its current enforcement approach to the MHPAEA’s requirements for non-quantitative treatment limitations (NQTLs). At the same […]
Read more
October 15, 2026
News

Compliance Advisor | Agencies Issue Transparency in Coverage Final Rules

On October 5, 2026, the Department of Health and Human Services (through the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services), in partnership with the Departments of Labor and the Department of the Treasury (collectively, the “Agencies”) jointly finalized changes to the Transparency in Coverage (TiC) regulations issued in December 2025 (“Final Rules”). The Final Rules impact […]
Read more
October 5, 2026
News

Building a Benefits Strategy for Financial Resilience

Financial wellbeing benefits have traditionally centered on a long-term goal: retirement. But employees’ financial lives don’t begin at retirement. Many are balancing immediate priorities, including healthcare expenses, debt, emergency savings, and everyday living costs. PwC’s 2026 Employee Financial Wellness Survey found that 59% of employees were currently stressed about their finances. For many employees, the immediate concern […]
Read more
October 5, 2026
News

New Guidance Regarding Health-Contingent Wellness Programs

The Departments of Labor (DOL), Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Treasury (collectively, the Departments) issued new FAQs addressing health-contingent wellness programs, including programs that impose tobacco-related premium surcharges. The guidance provides important enforcement relief concerning when a wellness reward must be provided after an individual completes a reasonable alternative standard. Health-contingent wellness programs […]
Read more