Guest Blog - EEOC Targets Employer Wellness Plan by Anne-Tyler Morgan, Associate of McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie & Kirkland, PLLC - Bim Group

Guest Blog – EEOC Targets Employer Wellness Plan by Anne-Tyler Morgan, Associate of McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie & Kirkland, PLLC

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) has filed its first lawsuit directly challenging a wellness program under the Americans with Disability Act (“ADA”). The case, EEOC v. Orion Energy Systems, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin on August 20, 2014.

The EEOC alleges that Orion penalized an employee in 2009 after she declined to participate in the company’s wellness program by requiring her to pay her entire health care insurance premium, in addition to a nonparticipation penalty of $50 per month. Shortly thereafter, the employee was fired – a move that the EEOC believes was retaliatory. Further, the agency contends, Orion required medical examinations and made disability-related inquiries of the employee that were neither job-related nor consistent with business necessity, in violation of the ADA. Such examinations and inquiries are permissible, but only if an employee is voluntarily participating in a wellness program. Orion’s program, according to the EEOC, was not truly voluntary because it penalized the employee when she declined to participate.

The EEOC’s press release announcing the suit states that 94% of employers with over 200 workers offer some sort of wellness plan, as do 63% of smaller employers. These employers should be particularly mindful of the numerous changes made to the regulations regarding wellness plans in May of 2013. Health-contingent wellness plans are particularly subject to onerous new legal requirements. If you have implemented a wellness plan for your employees, or are considering doing so, it is crucial that the terms and conditions of this plan are reviewed by legal counsel to ensure full legal compliance.

Anne-Tyler Morgan is an Associate of McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie & Kirkland, PLLC.  Ms. Morgan concentrates her practice in Health Care Law and is located in the firm’s Lexington office. She can be reached at atmorgan@mmlk.com, or at (859) 231-8780. 

This article is intended as a summary of federal and state law and does not constitute legal advice.

Recent Insights

November 5, 2026
News

DOL Clarifies MHPAEA Enforcement Priorities

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has provided employers and group health plans with a clearer picture of how it intends to enforce the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA). The DOL issued Field Assistance Bulletin 2026-03, outlining its current enforcement approach to the MHPAEA’s requirements for non-quantitative treatment limitations (NQTLs). At the same […]
Read more
October 15, 2026
News

Compliance Advisor | Agencies Issue Transparency in Coverage Final Rules

On October 5, 2026, the Department of Health and Human Services (through the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services), in partnership with the Departments of Labor and the Department of the Treasury (collectively, the “Agencies”) jointly finalized changes to the Transparency in Coverage (TiC) regulations issued in December 2025 (“Final Rules”). The Final Rules impact […]
Read more
October 5, 2026
News

Building a Benefits Strategy for Financial Resilience

Financial wellbeing benefits have traditionally centered on a long-term goal: retirement. But employees’ financial lives don’t begin at retirement. Many are balancing immediate priorities, including healthcare expenses, debt, emergency savings, and everyday living costs. PwC’s 2026 Employee Financial Wellness Survey found that 59% of employees were currently stressed about their finances. For many employees, the immediate concern […]
Read more
October 5, 2026
News

New Guidance Regarding Health-Contingent Wellness Programs

The Departments of Labor (DOL), Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Treasury (collectively, the Departments) issued new FAQs addressing health-contingent wellness programs, including programs that impose tobacco-related premium surcharges. The guidance provides important enforcement relief concerning when a wellness reward must be provided after an individual completes a reasonable alternative standard. Health-contingent wellness programs […]
Read more